Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and weight (625g / 22,05oz). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Scoring 8.21 out of 10 (625g / 22,05oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
