Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
