Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
