Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.1 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
