Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (190g / 6,7oz) and total score (7.69 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.73 out of 10 (190g / 6,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
