Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and total score (7.74 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
