Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 500 FI clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (180g / 6.3oz) and ergonomics (6.4 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 500 FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6.3oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
