Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
