Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.96 out of 10

Ergonomics4.08 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight275g / 9.70oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €47.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY

Spinning

60.10 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.1 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight269g / 9.49oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €53.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350

Conclusion

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6+1) and total score (6.01 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?

Shimano Sahara 2500 R

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles