Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and durability (5.98 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Penn International VISW?
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9.70oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
