Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.76 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
