Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
63.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (6.34 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Shimano Stradic SWB?
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX
- At 5.41 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX
