Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Spinning
37.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 SS DH HG
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (135g / 4,76oz). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.1 out of 10 (135g / 4,76oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
