Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Spinning
37.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 SS DH HG
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
