Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R

Spinning

37.00 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €51.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 SS DH HG
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Penn Sargus II Spinning

Spinning

2500x

64.80 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.05 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight284g / 10.02oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.20
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and weight (284g / 10,02oz). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R and Penn Sargus II Spinning?

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.