Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Spinning
37.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 SS DH HG
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and ergonomics (6.48 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R and Shimano Complex XR?
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
