Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Spinning
37.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 SS DH HG
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
