Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.99 out of 10

Ergonomics4.07 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight280g / 9.87oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €49.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Spinning

51.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag-

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €32.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Conclusion

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and total score (5.17 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.