Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.99 out of 10

Ergonomics4.07 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight280g / 9.87oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €49.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Stella FK

Spinning

87.30 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch

Ball bearings12+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €593.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Conclusion

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.73 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000S R and Shimano Stella FK?

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX

Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.