Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
63.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (6.34 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000S R and Shimano Stradic SWB?
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX
- At 5.41 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
