Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Spinning

38.50 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.99 out of 10

Ergonomics4.07 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight280g / 9.87oz

Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €49.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.82 out of 10

Ergonomics5.44 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag16kg / 35.27lbs

Weight670g / 23.63oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €245.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000PG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/275

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.82 out of 10) and maximum drag (16kg / 35,27lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 3000S R and Shimano Stradic SWB?

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX

Scoring 8.4 out of 10 (16kg / 35,27lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.