Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in total score (8 out of 10) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €199.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
