Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.44 out of 10) and weight (195g / 6,88oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €199.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
