Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.71 out of 10) and weight (425g / 14,99oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa 23 Caldia SW?
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.79 out of 10 (425g / 14,99oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
- Solid value at €213.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of seafishing fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX
