Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €22.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
