Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €22.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
