Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €22.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
