Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and total score (7.74 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €365.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
