Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R

Spinning

29.20 out of 100

Value for money2 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight375g / 13.23oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €53.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 DH
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Spinning

32.80 out of 100

Value for money2 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio4.6:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs

Weight425g / 14.99oz

Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000 FI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sedona 6000 FI and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and ergonomics. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona 6000 FI offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R

Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22.04lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt