Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg / 6.61 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X
