Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
