Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Spinning

42.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €50.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY

Spinning

47.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.41 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight176g / 6.21oz

Line retireve per crank0 inch

Ball bearings10+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €89.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290

Conclusion

Both Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X and Shimano Sahara 4000 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 4000 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg / 6.61 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues