Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Spinning

42.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €50.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Penn 2020 Clash II

Spinning

75.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics6.22 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.20
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and weight (235g / 8,29oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Penn 2020 Clash II?

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.