Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Spinning

42.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €50.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

67.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.1 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight270g / 9.52oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.40
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in weight (270g / 9,52oz) and ergonomics (6.1 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Penn FIERCE IV?

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X

With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.