Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Spinning

42.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €50.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Penn Squall II Conventional

Multireels

55.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.54 out of 10

Ergonomics5.91 out of 10

Gear ratio6:1:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight535g / 18.87oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €161.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size30 LH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationLeft
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Conclusion

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in weight (535g / 18,87oz) and ergonomics (5.91 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Penn Squall II Conventional?

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg / 6.61 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups