Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Spinning

42.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €50.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.82 out of 10

Ergonomics5.44 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag16kg / 35.27lbs

Weight670g / 23.63oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €245.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000PG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/275

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.82 out of 10) and total score (9.01 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Shimano Stradic SWB?

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX

Scoring 8.09 out of 10 (670g / 23,63oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.