Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin INKS 6000X
