Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
