Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (8.58 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
