Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
