Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX
