Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
