Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
