Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa BG MQ?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX
