Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Spinning

44.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa Crossfire LT

Spinning

49.60 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.86 out of 10

Ergonomics6.03 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight290g / 10.23oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €41.70
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX and Shimano Sahara 500 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Shimano Sahara 500 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa Crossfire LT?

Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques