Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa TANASENSOR?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
