Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and maximum drag (4 kg). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
