Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
