Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn Battle III 3000X

Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Spinning

44.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €62.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Penn Battle III

Spinning

72.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.73 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs

Weight330g / 11.64oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Conclusion

Penn Battle III 3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and durability (7.73 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Penn Battle III?

Penn Battle III 3000X

For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.