Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Aero BB
Spinning
39.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €61.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Aero BB 4000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara 500 FI offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Aero BB 4000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Aero BB?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Decent value at €62.00, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Aero BB 4000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
