Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.63 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
