Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.36 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Complex XR?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
