Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Shimano Sahara 500 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Sahara 500 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
